Add basic comparison between STUSB and TPS
This commit is contained in:
parent
cd32ce4b3e
commit
0605e1d01a
39
README.md
39
README.md
|
|
@ -39,7 +39,44 @@ standard uses it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- STUSB4500
|
- STUSB4500
|
||||||
- STUSB4500L
|
- STUSB4500L
|
||||||
- Some Texas Instruments chips
|
- TPS25730
|
||||||
|
- TPS25751
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### Comparison
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
All of the PD chips can basically run in auto-run mode--also called
|
||||||
|
dead battey mode. Since Ethy does not have any battery, the PD devices
|
||||||
|
have to be able to auto-configure or atleast allow for the standard 5V
|
||||||
|
output of the USB. The STUSB4500 are specc'ed for USB type-C rev 1.2
|
||||||
|
(for STUSB4500) and type-c rev 1.4 (for STUSB4500L). Both seem to function
|
||||||
|
with the PD rev 2.0 standard. However, according to the STUSB4500 documentation
|
||||||
|
it is interoperable with USB PD rev 3.0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Both the TPS devices are built for USB PD rev 3.1.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The biggest difference, to me, seems to be the control of an external
|
||||||
|
power path. The STUSB devices can only function with an external power path
|
||||||
|
while the TPS devies also have an internal power path. The biggest difference
|
||||||
|
however, is the type of switch that can be used for each chip.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The STUSB4500 and STUSB4500L have active drain outputs, meaning that the
|
||||||
|
switches should be based on P-channel MOSFETS, as uses in their reference
|
||||||
|
design. The TPS devies have an internal charge pump which means they can
|
||||||
|
use N-channel MOSFETS. N-channel MOSFETS generally have a smaller footprint
|
||||||
|
and smaller R_ds(on) than the P-channel counterparts. This can be seen in
|
||||||
|
the reference designs of PD IC's. The TPS chips use the CSD87501L dual common
|
||||||
|
drain n-channel from Texas Instruments. This dual channel MOSFET has a
|
||||||
|
source-to-source R_ds(on) of 6.6 milliOhm at a Gate Source Voltage of 10 V.
|
||||||
|
For the maximum load of 12V @ 5A, the power loss would be around 165mW.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Comparing to the P-channel MOSFETS in the STUSB chips, the reference design
|
||||||
|
uses the STL6P3LLH6 MOSFET from STM. This MOSFET has a maximum R_ds(on) of
|
||||||
|
around 30milliOhm. at 5A this would result in 0.75 W of loss. Considering
|
||||||
|
that both designs need two MOSFETS, the loss in the MOSFETS for the STUSB chips
|
||||||
|
would be around 1.5W.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This difference in power loss can also be seen in the package size, since
|
||||||
|
the CSD87501L is half the size of a single STL6P3LLH6 MOSFET.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Possible DC/DC chips for controllers
|
#### Possible DC/DC chips for controllers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user